OVERALL SCORE: 3.0/5 WE CAN’T RECOMMEND contentdetector.ai TO OUR READERS
Contentdetector.ai
Rating
3
Rating
4.1
Emma Miller
Review writer at NoCramming
Published on
March 31, 2025
Updated on
March 31, 2025

An Overview of Contentdetector.ai

Contentdetector.ai isn’t a well-known tool. If you check popular review aggregators like Trustpilot or Sitejabber, you won’t even find it there. The only platform with feedback on AI contentdetector is G2, but it only has 12 reviews—not nearly enough for a solid rating. Currently, contentdetector.ai’s customer satisfaction score is 4.1, but frankly, most of the reviews don’t seem real or even human-written, so the score is unreliable.

Why wouldn’t we recommend trusting contentdetector.ai’s reviews on G2? Based on their content, it’s clear that the people (or, more likely, AI) who wrote them haven’t even tested the tool. For example, one of the top reviews mentions that contentdetector.ai has a “premium product price,” which supposedly makes it unaffordable for small business owners. But we’ve tested it, and it’s actually free—something doesn’t check out.

Still, a few G2 reviews seem better-informed and mention both the pros and cons of contentdetector.ai. We agree with the reviewers that its main advantages are that it’s free and has no limits on checks. However, the tool’s features are very limited, and the accuracy of its checks is questionable at best. Let’s explore this in more detail.

Contentdetector.ai: Our Rating

Contentdetector.ai isn’t the only AI detector available for free. ZeroGPT, Quillbot, Writer, and a few others are also available free of charge, but they all have limits on checks. For example, on ZeroGPT, you can only check up to 15,000 characters at once (unless you’re willing to upgrade to one of the paid plans). In contrast, contentdetector.ai lets you check texts of any length as many times as you want at no cost.

Sound too good to be true? It is. While AI content-detecting tools are only reliable to an extent—false positives are very common, and it’s also not that hard to trick a detector—they’re generally able to differentiate human writing from AI. Based on our experience with contentdetector.ai, it isn’t. So, while you can use it as much as you want without paying anything, why would you if the results you get aren’t accurate? There’s no point.

Price
5.0
Quality
2.0
Features
2.5
Support
1.5
Ease of Use
4.0
Reputation
3.0
See More
See Less

Accuracy: How Reliable Are Contentdetector.ai’s Checks?

While it’s great that contentdetector.ai is free and allows unlimited checks, the most important question to ask is, “Is contentdetector.ai accurate?” The goal of any AI detector is to catch AI-generated content accurately. Otherwise, why would we even use them?

Sadly, based on our experience with contentdetector.ai, the tool is anything but accurate. We ran two texts through it: one mostly human-written (roughly one-fourth of it generated) and the other completely AI-generated.

According to contentdetector.ai, 41.18% of the human-written text was AI-generated, with the verdict being “Likely human.” We have no idea where this number came from, as the share of highlighted fragments—meaning those flagged as AI-generated—made up much less.

Most of what was highlighted were numbers and random sentences akin to “So, why not give it a try?” The only explanation was, “This content looks too robotic.” To compare, the same text came back at 22.53% AI-generated on ZeroGPT and 0% on Quillbot.

But wait—it gets worse. The second text we checked—which was completely AI-generated—was ruled “likely human” with a 50% score. Both ZeroGPT and Quillbot correctly deemed it 90-100% AI-generated.

As you can see, you can’t trust contentdetector.ai if you care about accuracy.

How Helpful Is Contentdetector.ai Support?

In our experience, contentdetector.ai’s customer support is essentially non-existent. Sure, it’s a free tool, so it would be naive to expect much from it (like, say, a WhatsApp, a live chat, or even a phone number)—those are perks we pay for when choosing paid options over free alternatives.

However, we did expect at least one way to contact contentdetector.ai’s customer support. The website suggests you can reach them through the email address listed on the “Contact” page—hello@contentdetector.ai. Don’t bother—either it wasn’t our lucky day, or there’s simply no one there to respond. We waited for a reply for two days, but it never came.

Remember how we said that the G2 reviews for contentdetector.ai looked inauthentic? Here’s more proof: a couple of them specifically mention how responsive and helpful the support team is. Don’t trust them—it’s not. If you’re experiencing issues with contentdetector.ai, you’re better off trying a different plagiarism detection tool.

Ease of Use: How Convenient Is Contendetector.ai?

We’re not here to diss contentdetector.ai just to diss it; we always do our best to keep our reviews objective. So, we’ll happily admit that it’s one of the most convenient plagiarism detectors we’ve ever tried.

First, not only is contentdetector.ai free, but you don’t even need to create an account to use it. That’s rare and incredibly convenient when all you need is a quick check.

Also, unlike other plagiarism detection tools available for free, contentdetector.ai has no character or word limit. We don’t recommend running entire books through it—it’ll likely crash, as the tool is a bit glitchy—but a 5,000-word essay or article should be fine. And the process only takes a few seconds!

Contentdetector-ai Pricing: Is It an Affordable Tool?

If you’re wondering about the contentdetector.ai price, don’t worry—it’s completely free, which is its biggest advantage.

All other AI detectors that allow free checks have a word or character limit. For example, while you can use ZeroGPT for free, if you want to check a test that’s longer than 15,000 characters (roughly 2,400-2,800 words), you need to upgrade to one of the paid plans, which start at $7.99/month. The same is true for basically all AI detectors we’ve come across.

There are no such limitations with contentdetector.ai. No matter how long your text is or how many texts you’re going to run through one after another, the tool remains free. However, considering how unreliable it is, even compared to other detectors, does that really matter? When a tool flags a fully AI-generated text as “Likely human,” it might make more sense to skip AI checks altogether.

Report Generation

No AI detector can guarantee 100% accuracy, even the most advanced of them, like Quillbot or Copyleaks. That’s why a score alone isn’t enough—any AI detection tool should provide additional information.

For example, in addition to giving a number that reflects the probability of the text being human-written or AI-generated, Quillbot also includes a so-called “confidence level” for different fragments. Parts of the text can be ruled AI-generated with “High confidence” and others with “Low confidence.”

Contentdetector.ai doesn’t offer this. For every highlighted part, it gives the explanation, “This content looks too robotic.” Again, we understand it’s a free tool, and, therefore, the resources are limited, but that’s simply not enough.

Besides, if you need a detailed report with a breakdown of your AI score (say, if the publication you’re submitting your article to requires this), contentdetector.ai won’t be helpful. You won’t get a report, and there’s no way to pay for one—it just isn’t an option.

See More
See Less
EssayHub Ranks Among the Top 3 Best Writing Services

How Quick Is Contentdetector ai?

Contentdetector.ai is one of the quickest AI detection tools we’ve seen. The texts we ran through were around 600-800 words long, and the results were ready in just a second both times. While impressive, this also seems a little suspicious, seeing as other checkers typically take at least a few seconds.

Also, although there is no word or character limit, and you can use contentdetector.ai to check a text of any length, we wouldn’t recommend it for anything above 3,000 words. We tried running a 6,000-word essay through it just to check the processing time, and contentdetector.ai crashed—we never got a score. We tried again but had no luck.

Perhaps if you want to use the tool for a longer text, it makes sense to break it down into shorter parts and check those separately one by one.

Other Contentdetector Features

If you go to the very bottom of contentdetector.ai’s home page, you’ll find links to a few other writing tools—all of them free. They include the following:
- AI Story Generator
- Essay Generator
- Book Title Generator
- Sentence Shortener
- Sentence Expander, and a few more.

For some reason, not all of them work—no matter how many times we tried to adjust the prompt, we couldn’t get an essay from the Essay Generator—but those that do are fine. In particular, the AI Story Generator and the Book Title Generator can be helpful if you write fiction regularly.

That said, given how glitchy contentdetector.ai can be, it might make more sense to use ChatGPT instead. None of the features contentdetector.ai offers are unique, and some alternatives are both free and of higher quality.

Contentdetector.ai Pros and Cons: A Free but Unreliable Tool

Overall, while contentdetector.ai has a few major advantages—like the fact that it’s free and doesn’t have a word limit for checks—the cons outweigh the pros. The results are unreliable, there’s almost no explanation for the score, and the tool can be very glitchy. As stated in Section 3 of contentdetector.ai’s Terms and Conditions, “Any reliance on the material on this site is at your own risk.”

Pros:
  • ✅ Contentdetector.ai is free
  • ✅ It has no character or word limit for checks; the number of free checks is also unlimited
  • ✅ It has an easy-to-navigate interface
Cons:
  • ❌ Contentdetector.ai’s accuracy is low; it fails to distinguish between human-written and AI-generated content correctly
  • ❌ The only way to contact the support team is via email, but you might not even get a response
  • ❌ The tool is glitchy, especially if you’re trying to check a text that’s longer than 3,000 words or so
  • ❌ You can’t get a report with a detailed breakdown of your score
See More
See Less

Frequently Asked Questions

Is contentdetector.ai legit?

Contentdetector.ai is legit in that you can use it to check if a text is human-written or not. However, it’s not accurate at all, so don’t expect much.

Is contentdetector.ai reliable? Can I trust its checks?

No, contentdetector.ai isn’t reliable. It fails to differentiate a human-written text from an AI-generated one correctly, and it provides no explanations beyond “This content looks too robotic."

Do I have to pay for contentdetector.ai?

No, you don’t need to pay—contentdetector.ai is entirely free. Unlike other detectors available online, it doesn’t even have a paid version, so you can’t pay to upgrade your plan or get a detailed report.Is contentdetector.ai scam?

Is it safe to use?

Contentdetector.ai isn’t a scam, as it doesn’t require you to pay for something you won’t get. However, as it fails to do its job—meaning, identify human-written vs. AI-generated content—it’s understandable why someone might consider it somewhat scammy.

Does contentdetector.ai have a character limit?

No, contentdetector.ai is one of the very few free AI detectors without any word or character limits. You can use it as many times as you want to check texts of any length.

Does contentdetector.ai have a plagiarism detector?

No, there’s no built-in plagiarism detector in contentdetector.ai, and it’s not available separately, either. If you’re looking for a tool that would have both an AI detector and a plagiarism detector, you might want to look into a different platform, for example, Copyleaks.

*Screenshots used for review and criticism purposes fall under the 'fair use' doctrine of the United States Copyright Law.

The latest customer reviews

Contentdetector.ai
User ID:
25016
Rating
3.0
Surprisingly fast and easy to use. I just wish it showed more detailed reasoning behind the detection. Still useful though.
Name:
Omar J.
3/4/2025
Contentdetector.ai
User ID:
71829
Rating
3.0
Decent tool. It gives you a quick idea, but don’t rely on it for academic or professional use. Use it as a reference only.
Name:
Lila M.
3/10/2025
Contentdetector.ai
User ID:
10283
Rating
3.0
It works decently for basic checks, but sometimes it flags human-written content as AI. Good for quick scans but not 100% reliable.
Name:
Jym T.
12/10/2024
Contentdetector.ai
User ID:
58741
Rating
3.1
I like that it's completely free and has no usage limits. Not perfect, but for a free tool, it's honestly better than expected.
Name:
Carla N.
2/20/2025
Contentdetector.ai
User ID:
39405
Rating
2.8
The interface is simple, but I found the detection results inconsistent. One moment it says “100% human,” next time “AI-written.” Needs improvement.
Name:
Dev R.
2/16/2025

Wanna share your feedback?
Drop a comment here

Rating
Thank you!
We've received your feedback!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

You Might Also Be Interested In

MyEssayWriter AI
MyEssayWriter AI
MyEssayWriter AI
11$ /page
Rating
3.2
Price
2.0
Quality
2.5
Features
3.0
Support
4.0
Ease of Use
3.0
Reputation
4.8
Copy.ai
Copy.ai
Copy.ai
$49/month
Rating
3.0
Price
3.7
Quality
2.5
Features
3.5
Support
1.5
Ease of Use
3.2
Reputation
3.6
Textero AI
Textero AI
Textero AI
$16.99/month
Rating
3.6
Price
4.0
Quality
3.2
Features
4.0
Support
3.1
Ease of Use
4.5
Reputation
3.0